- From: James M Snell <jasnell@us.ibm.com>
- Date: 22-Sep-2002 22:25:47 EDT
- To: <www-ws-arch@w3.org>
Here, here. Definitely agreed with Mike. We should get an architecture document published to any and all interested parties for review. I'm far more concerned about progress the state of web services than looking for a review from one particular group. Cheers, Dave > -----Original Message----- > From: www-ws-arch-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-arch-request@w3.org]On > Behalf Of Champion, Mike > Sent: Saturday, September 21, 2002 11:59 AM > To: www-ws-arch@w3.org > Subject: RE: WSA diffs from REST > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Mark Baker [mailto:distobj@acm.org] > > Sent: Saturday, September 21, 2002 2:19 PM > > To: David Orchard > > Cc: www-ws-arch@w3.org > > Subject: Re: WSA diffs from REST > > > > I suggest that my list of accepted constraints (modulo rephrasing to > > remove the references to REST), plus your XML one, and any > others that > > WG thinks are there, would be sufficient. > > I think our job is to consider the the constraints of the web > itsel <truncated...>
Received on Sunday, 22 September 2002 22:27:26 UTC