- From: Sedukhin, Igor <Igor.Sedukhin@ca.com>
- Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2002 10:32:57 -0400
- To: "Mark Baker" <distobj@acm.org>, "Mark Jones" <jones@research.att.com>
- Cc: "Heather Kreger" <kreger@us.ibm.com>, <www-ws-arch@w3.org>
Mark, but how to you know about the URL to send HTTP GET? May be you called me over a phone or went to google search, right? That makes a logical operation of "publish", "find" using a discovery mechanism of choice. It can be P2P, like a port scan or it can be phone or what have you. Discovery is conceptually different than semantic interactions. That is what the triangle diagram captures. -- Igor Sedukhin .. (igor.sedukhin@ca.com) -- (631) 342-4325 .. 1 CA Plaza, Islandia, NY 11788 -----Original Message----- From: Mark Baker [mailto:distobj@acm.org] Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 9:26 PM To: Mark Jones Cc: Heather Kreger; www-ws-arch@w3.org Subject: Re: arch diagrams from the f2f I wanted to say that the concern I raised about the triangle diagram - that it's logical, but may be interpreted as suggesting the existence of particular technologies - appears to be the case in Mark's slides (though at the f2f we appeared to have started down this path). I consider it a fundamental advance of the Web over previous distributed systems, that "publish" and "find" are integrated into "interact", all by virtue of the joined-at-the-hip relationship between a URI and the HTTP GET method. I suggest that we refrain from attempting to map specific technologies to this diagram for this reason. If we're going to do any mapping, we should have a separate physical diagram with which to do that. Thanks. MB -- Mark Baker, CTO, Idokorro Mobile (formerly Planetfred) Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. distobj@acm.org http://www.markbaker.ca http://www.idokorro.com
Received on Thursday, 19 September 2002 10:33:29 UTC