- From: Katia Sycara <katia@cs.cmu.edu>
- Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2002 10:11:31 -0400
- To: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>, Mark Jones <jones@research.att.com>
- Cc: Heather Kreger <kreger@us.ibm.com>, www-ws-arch@w3.org
Mark, "find" and such do not prescribe any particular technology, they just indicate the functionality of the particular interaction. Cheers, Katia -----Original Message----- From: www-ws-arch-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-arch-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Mark Baker Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 9:26 PM To: Mark Jones Cc: Heather Kreger; www-ws-arch@w3.org Subject: Re: arch diagrams from the f2f I wanted to say that the concern I raised about the triangle diagram - that it's logical, but may be interpreted as suggesting the existence of particular technologies - appears to be the case in Mark's slides (though at the f2f we appeared to have started down this path). I consider it a fundamental advance of the Web over previous distributed systems, that "publish" and "find" are integrated into "interact", all by virtue of the joined-at-the-hip relationship between a URI and the HTTP GET method. I suggest that we refrain from attempting to map specific technologies to this diagram for this reason. If we're going to do any mapping, we should have a separate physical diagram with which to do that. Thanks. MB -- Mark Baker, CTO, Idokorro Mobile (formerly Planetfred) Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. distobj@acm.org http://www.markbaker.ca http://www.idokorro.com
Received on Thursday, 19 September 2002 10:13:07 UTC