- From: Joseph Hui <jhui@digisle.net>
- Date: Fri, 3 May 2002 16:11:13 -0700
- To: "Hugo Haas" <hugo@w3.org>, <www-ws-arch@w3.org>
Hi Hugo, > D-AC020.1 > > A service consumer must be able to know the privacy > policies of the > service provider(s) that it is going to interact with. This sounds good, except the "service consumer must be able to" part seems to place the burden (of privacy policies) more on the consumer than on the provider. If it's agreeable that the burden should be mostly (or even solely?) on the provider, then it may help to invert the statement to something like: A service provider MUST disclose its privacy policies in manners that can be easily understood by the consumers. In the absence of such disclosure, a consumer (of the service) SHOULD assume that neither the service nor its provider furnishes any privacy policy. Cheers, Joe Hui Exodus, a Cable & Wireless service ============================================ > -----Original Message----- > From: Hugo Haas [mailto:hugo@w3.org] > Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 1:13 PM > To: www-ws-arch@w3.org > Subject: Re: What to make of D-AC020.1? > > > Hi Joe. > > * Joseph Hui <jhui@digisle.net> [2002-05-02 15:43-0700] > > D-AC020.1 is in the form of a question (as opposed to a statement). > > What are we supposed to make of it as a CSF? > > Would the following rewording, carrying the same ideas, address your > concerns: > > D-AC020.1 > > A service consumer must be able to know the privacy > policies of the > service provider(s) that it is going to interact with. > > Regards, > > Hugo > > -- > Hugo Haas - W3C > mailto:hugo@w3.org - http://www.w3.org/People/Hugo/ - > tel:+1-617-452-2092 > >
Received on Friday, 3 May 2002 19:11:17 UTC