RE: AG004 Closure Sought

Hugo,

So you don't intend to re-prefix the current (D-)AC020.x
bullets from "AC" to "AR" then, right?

Joe Hui
Exodus, a Cable & Wireless service
=================================================

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hugo Haas [mailto:hugo@w3.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 2:24 PM
> To: www-ws-arch@w3.org
> Subject: Re: AG004 Closure Sought
> 
> 
> 
> * Joseph Hui <Joseph.Hui@exodus.net> [2002-07-24 14:18-0700]
> > I've been under the impression that the AC020.x were
> > Privacy requirements mistakenly prefixed with AC instead of AR,
> > and AC020 was the critical success factor (CSF).
> > They surely read like requirements instead of CSFs to me.
> > If those are indeed AC's, then I think some ARs are needed
> > to be stated, because it's hard to imagine there'll be only
> > CSFs but no requirements under the Privacy section in the
> > requirements spec.
> 
> I said AC020 as a reference to the group of things under AC020.
> 
> I indeed believe that they look more like requirements than CSFs to
> me, and I don't think that as Rigo said being a requirement diminishes
> their strength: the architecture will have to meet the requirements.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Hugo
> 
> -- 
> Hugo Haas - W3C
> mailto:hugo@w3.org - http://www.w3.org/People/Hugo/ - 
> tel:+1-617-452-2092
> 
>

Received on Wednesday, 24 July 2002 17:35:24 UTC