- From: Hugo Haas <hugo@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2002 17:24:09 -0400
- To: www-ws-arch@w3.org
* Joseph Hui <Joseph.Hui@exodus.net> [2002-07-24 14:18-0700] > I've been under the impression that the AC020.x were > Privacy requirements mistakenly prefixed with AC instead of AR, > and AC020 was the critical success factor (CSF). > They surely read like requirements instead of CSFs to me. > If those are indeed AC's, then I think some ARs are needed > to be stated, because it's hard to imagine there'll be only > CSFs but no requirements under the Privacy section in the > requirements spec. I said AC020 as a reference to the group of things under AC020. I indeed believe that they look more like requirements than CSFs to me, and I don't think that as Rigo said being a requirement diminishes their strength: the architecture will have to meet the requirements. Regards, Hugo -- Hugo Haas - W3C mailto:hugo@w3.org - http://www.w3.org/People/Hugo/ - tel:+1-617-452-2092
Received on Wednesday, 24 July 2002 17:23:35 UTC