- From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
- Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2002 11:10:39 -0400
- To: Miles Sabin <miles@milessabin.com>
- Cc: www-ws-arch@w3.org
On Mon, Jul 01, 2002 at 09:53:59AM +0100, Miles Sabin wrote: > I think Edwins point here is that email (and I'd add DNS) is at least as > ubiquitous and robust as the HTTP/hypertext web, hence that REST isn't > the only successful model we have for internet scale architectures. DNS > illustrates the point particularly clearly given that HTTP, the only > widely deployed implementation of REST, rests (no pun intended) on DNS > as one of it's essential foundations (ie. HTTP/REST can't be any more > ubiquitous and robust than DNS). > > It's one thing to observe that internet scale CORBA hasn't been terribly > successful in the past. It's quite another to claim that this implies > that REST is the only way to go. I've never claimed it's the only way to go. I *have* claimed it is the most general distributed architecture ever created, and I stand by that claim. But since we're talking about other systems like email, DNS, etc.. I must point out that *all* successful systems on the Internet define their methods a priori. MB -- Mark Baker, CTO, Idokorro Mobile (formerly Planetfred) Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. distobj@acm.org http://www.markbaker.ca http://www.idokorro.com
Received on Monday, 1 July 2002 10:59:53 UTC