- From: Cutler, Roger (RogerCutler) <RogerCutler@chevrontexaco.com>
- Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2002 15:52:47 -0600
- To: www-ws-arch@w3.org
It seems that people are agreeing that web services are the atomic components from which orchestrations are made -- but that a web service might under the covers involve the aggregation of other services as long as it is providing a single "answer" to a single "question", I suppose that answer might come next Thursday or be composed of several decoupled transmissions of information (e.g. confirmation of receipt now, detailed response next Thursday). That's fine, but it seems to me that the issues of orchestrations or work flows should rear it's head somewhere in this. The reason I say this is that I think that there are probably desirable requirements for web services that one may only find by considering them in the context of such processes. For example -- and I don't claim that this is a very good one, but I am just trying to suggest a style -- if you are talking about a purchase process that has things like purchase orders and invoices going back and forth, each component web service is going to have various familiar security requirements like identification and authorization. "Am I really who I say I am and am I authorized to purchase something?" But in the context of a purchase process I think that there is probably also a requirement that a message be unassailably tied to a particular transaction, so that one cannot somehow pay for a Yugo and get shipped a Cadillac.
Received on Thursday, 21 February 2002 16:53:09 UTC