- From: Bernard Vatant <bernard.vatant@mondeca.com>
- Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2003 14:38:45 +0100
- To: <www-webont-wg@w3.org>
YES for Mondeca Bernard Vatant Senior Consultant Knowledge Engineering Mondeca - www.mondeca.com bernard.vatant@mondeca.com > -----Message d'origine----- > De : www-webont-wg-request@w3.org > [mailto:www-webont-wg-request@w3.org]De la part de Sandro Hawke > Envoyé : mercredi 26 novembre 2003 19:58 > À : www-webont-wg@w3.org > Objet : WebOnt PR Decision [IMPORTANT - Monday Deadline!] > > > > > Our decision on 13 November to request advancement to PR [1] was based > in part on my suggestion that we could keep making changes to the test > suite during PR and even after Rec. This suggestion was probably > misleading, and I apologize. During PR, we should only make changes > based on new information. After Rec, any changes are handled as > normative errata [2], requiring review by the members and a director's > decision recognizing consensus. What other groups have done (and this > is what confused me) is make a *non-normative* test suite, not part of > their recommendation, which they maintain outside the W3C Rec track > review process. We are free to do that, of course. > > In light of this, DanC, Guus, and I met (we were unable to reach > JimH) and hereby ask for a decision via e-mail to approve the output > of the 20 November meeting [3], recognizing that these will be the > last changes to the normative test suite except for possible changes > due to new information during PR and normative errata. > > Specifically, proposed are: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Nov/0084.html > From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com> > Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 10:54:51 +0000 > Subject: proposal to change some datatype tests from APPROVED > to EXTRACREDIT > and > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Nov/0092.html > From: Sean Bechhofer <seanb@cs.man.ac.uk> > Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2003 11:08:50 +0000 (GMT Standard Time) > Subject: Proposal to approve tests > > As part of this, I also propose the Working Group delegate the > question of whether the PROPOSED tests stay in the document to Jeremy > and Jos. (Dan and I lean towards them being removed.) > > PLEASE RESPOND TO THE LIST SAYING YES, NO (and state the nature of > your objection), OR ABSTAIN by the end of Monday, 1 December. If > there is not consensus here, we can work on it at the 4 December > telecon, but we'll have to postpone the transition meeting > (tentatively scheduled for 8 December) and subsequent publication (9 > December), because the meeting needs a 7-day lead time. > > Monday, 1 December, is also the deadline for all editors to put their > pencils down and be done with their drafts. (Jeremy can assume the > consensus position will hold; if not, there will be a new, later > deadline.) Please leave the working group membership list, the Status > of this Document section, and the RDF PR references marked with "@@" > and I'll paste in the final versions. I'll be looking at the > following URLs, and I'd like confirmation from the associated people. > > Overview - Deborah? (Guus had an action item to coordinate this) > http://www.ksl.stanford.edu/people/dlm/webont/OWLOverview.htm > > Guide - Mike Smith > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/WebOnt/guide-src/Guide.html > > Reference - Guus > http://www.daml.org/2002/06/webont/owl-ref-proposed > > S&AS - Ian > http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~horrocks/owl/semantics/ > > Test - Jeremy > http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/editors-draft/snapshot > > UC&R - Jeff > http://www.cse.lehigh.edu/~heflin/webont/reqdoc/ > > For the curious, the current draft of the Request for PR, from Jim > with some edits from me, is at [3]. > > Thanks for everyone's help -- sorry again for the confusion about test > maintenence from last meeting. > > -- sandro > > [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Nov/0064.html > [2] http://www.w3.org/2003/06/Process-20030618/tr.html#rec-modify > [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Nov/0091.html > [4] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/WebOnt/rqimpr.html >
Received on Thursday, 27 November 2003 08:41:13 UTC