- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2003 10:33:51 -0500 (EST)
- To: jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com
- Cc: www-webont-wg@w3.org
From: "Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com> Subject: owl:OntologyProperty Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2003 15:26:58 +0100 > > > I just had a question from a colleague on the term owl:OntologyProperty > appearing in S&AS ... > > He's more up on it than I am. > > This does not seem to reflect any WG decision :( > in particular it is not mentioned nor implicit in > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Mar/0066.html > part E > > As I understand it, the only ontologyPropertyIDs are the built-in ones, > which do not need such a declaration. Agreed. > If we are permitting user defined ones then we would need an axiom for their > definition. Agreed. > Jeremy I don't know what this has to do with owl:OntologyProperty, however. peter
Received on Tuesday, 25 March 2003 10:36:29 UTC