- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2003 10:32:45 -0500 (EST)
- To: jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com
- Cc: www-webont-wg@w3.org
From: "Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com> Subject: S&AS stylistic comment Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2003 15:27:00 +0100 > > I had one editorial/stylistic comment from January that I feel is pertinent > at this stage; it concerns section 4. > > L: introduction > I think this could be improved with additional text along the lines of: > [[ > OWL DL has semantics defined over the abstract syntax > and a concrete syntax consisting of a subset of RDF graphs. > Hence it is necessary to relate specific abstract syntax ontologies > with specific RDF/XML documents and their corresponding graphs. > This section defines a many-to-many relationship between > abstract syntax ontologies and RDF graphs. This is done > using a set of nondeterministic mapping rules. > Thus to apply the semantics to a particular RDF graph it is necessary > to find one of the abstract syntax ontologies that correspond with that > graph under the mapping rules and to apply the semantics to that > abstract ontology. > The mapping is designed so that any of the RDF/XML graphs > that correspond to a particular abstarct ontology have the same meaning, > as do any of the abstract ontologies that correspond to a > particular RDF/XML graph. > Moreover, since this process cannot be applied to RDF graphs > that do not have corresponding abstract syntax forms, the mapping > rules implicitly define a set of graphs, which syntactically > characterise OWL DL in RDF/XML. > Since running the mapping rules backwards is difficult > an alternative syntactic characterization of OWL DL in RDF graphs > is also given. > ]] > > > That's it - I have now completed a rapid re-review of S&AS. > > Jeremy > I've added this a the second paragraph of Section 4, commenting out the last sentence for now. peter
Received on Tuesday, 25 March 2003 10:33:07 UTC