- From: Deborah L. McGuinness <dlm@ksl.Stanford.EDU>
- Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2003 09:21:45 -0800
- To: "Jeff Z. Pan" <pan@cs.man.ac.uk>
- CC: www-webont-wg@w3.org
thx for the review. the overview document uses individual and class without namespace prefixes - thus those are in the owl namespace. in section 2 it points out "Prefixes of rdf: or rdfs: are used when terms are already present in RDF or RDF Schema. Otherwise terms are introduced by OWL. Thus, the term rdfs:subPropertyOf indicates that subPropertyOf is already in the rdfs vocabulary (technically : the rdfs namespace). Also, the term Class is more precisely stated as owl:Class and is a term introduced by OWL. " deborah Jeff Z. Pan wrote: >In section 2.1 of the overview document, "individual" is listed as one of the RDF >Schema features. > >However, when I checked the updated versions of RDF/XML Syntax Specification >(Revised) [1], RDF Vocabulary Description Language 1.0: RDF Schema [2], and RDF >Semantics [3], I noticed that rdfs:individual is not defined/used in any of them. > >Jeff >-- >Jeff Z. Pan ( http://DL-Web.man.ac.uk/ ) >Computer Science Dept., The University of Manchester > > >[1] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/TR/WD-rdf-syntax-grammar-20030117/ >[2] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/TR/WD-rdf-schema-20030117/ >[3] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/TR/WD-rdf-mt-20030117/ > > >
Received on Tuesday, 4 March 2003 12:23:01 UTC