- From: Deborah L. McGuinness <dlm@ksl.Stanford.EDU>
- Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2003 09:15:34 -0800
- To: "Jeff Z. Pan" <pan@cs.man.ac.uk>
- CC: www-webont-wg@w3.org
thx for the review. the best version to read is the editors version: http://www.ksl.stanford.edu/people/dlm/webont/OWLOverview.htm that version had found the problem below and has a couple of other minor updates that came up after feb 10. deborah Jeff Z. Pan wrote: >Web Ontology Language (OWL): Overview >W3C Working Draft 10 February 2003 > >Section 1.3, last paragraph: > >"OWL Full can be viewed as an extension of RDF, while OWL Lite and OWL *Full* can >be viewed as extensions of a restricted view of RDF. " > >should be > >"OWL Full can be viewed as an extension of RDF, while OWL Lite and OWL *DL* can >be viewed as extensions of a restricted view of RDF. " > >Jeff >-- >Jeff Z. Pan ( http://DL-Web.man.ac.uk/ ) >Computer Science Dept., The University of Manchester > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 4 March 2003 12:16:59 UTC