- From: Jeff Z. Pan <pan@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2003 17:30:24 -0000
- To: "Deborah L. McGuinness" <dlm@ksl.Stanford.EDU>
- Cc: <www-webont-wg@w3.org>
----- Original Message ----- From: "Deborah L. McGuinness" <dlm@ksl.Stanford.EDU> To: "Jeff Z. Pan" <pan@cs.man.ac.uk> Cc: <www-webont-wg@w3.org> Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 5:15 PM Subject: Re: A typo in the overview document > thx for the review. No problem. > the best version to read is the editors version: > http://www.ksl.stanford.edu/people/dlm/webont/OWLOverview.htm I did read this version ... > that version had found the problem below and has a couple of other minor > updates that came up after feb 10. Oh, I see what happened - the urls in the table of contents point to the old documents. Jeff > > deborah > > Jeff Z. Pan wrote: > > >Web Ontology Language (OWL): Overview > >W3C Working Draft 10 February 2003 > > > >Section 1.3, last paragraph: > > > >"OWL Full can be viewed as an extension of RDF, while OWL Lite and OWL *Full* can > >be viewed as extensions of a restricted view of RDF. " > > > >should be > > > >"OWL Full can be viewed as an extension of RDF, while OWL Lite and OWL *DL* can > >be viewed as extensions of a restricted view of RDF. " > > > >Jeff > >-- > >Jeff Z. Pan ( http://DL-Web.man.ac.uk/ ) > >Computer Science Dept., The University of Manchester > > > > > > > > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 4 March 2003 12:27:35 UTC