- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: 28 Feb 2002 13:42:38 -0600
- To: "Peter F. "Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Cc: schreiber@swi.psy.uva.nl, www-webont-wg@w3.org, hendler@cs.umd.edu
On Thu, 2002-02-28 at 12:41, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: > > 3. Semantics: As evidenced by the layering discussion, developing > > the semantic model for the language (mandated by our charter) is not > > easy, but needs to be done. We expect to produce both a model theory > > and an axiomization similar to the ones prepared for DAML+OIL. > > Well there has been work done on the layering issues, but it seems to have > been put off and put off again from the agenda. Therefore, I would like to > have an agenda item for next week on the layering issue. I've been studying the layering stuff, but I'm not sure how to prepare for a telcon discussion of layering. If you have anything in particular in mind, please let me/us know. It takes me a while to get the relevant stuff swapped in my brain to discuss that layering stuff. Also, I have an internal telcon on Tuesdays, and if you can get me something before then, I can discuss it with some other folks in preparation for a telcon. Oh... one thing that would help me is if you and PatH could summarize the thread you guys had. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2002Feb/0134.html I didn't follow all of it. Was there any particular result of the discussion? -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Thursday, 28 February 2002 14:42:49 UTC