> > >[ Frank:] >> I would suggest that getting RDFS to accept a layered theory would >>solve many of our problems with building OWL on top of RDFS. > >I agree - we even went so far as to design such an architecture >(RDFS(FA)). Moreover, I think the proposal to have some triples tagged >as being "not asserted" more or less amounts to a simple implementation >of the same idea. WHAT??? Nonsense, they have nothing to do with one another. >Ian > >> >> Frank. >> ---- Pat -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- IHMC (850)434 8903 home 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office Pensacola, FL 32501 (850)202 4440 fax phayes@ai.uwf.edu http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayesReceived on Friday, 15 February 2002 03:43:41 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:04:27 UTC