- From: Jim Hendler <hendler@cs.umd.edu>
- Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2002 20:56:39 -0500
- To: Deborah McGuinness <dlm@ksl.stanford.edu>, Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: www-webont-wg@w3.org
> >> Ugh! >> >> I'm trying to prepare for tomorrow's telcon, >> and I think it's a shame that so much energy >> is being spent on whether something is in >> OWL Lite or not, or whether OWL Lite has >> a different semantics or what-not. >> >> I'm tempted to use this as new information >> and ask to re-open issue 5.2 on the grounds >> that OWL Lite is putting our schedule at risk. > >http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/WebOnt/webont-issues.html#I5.2-Language-Compliance-Levels Guus is out of town leaving me to make Chair decisions. The chair does not see a reason to reopen this issue at this time. -JH p.s. Owl Lite doesn't put our schedule at list. We can close hasValue with a vote, record objections, and move on. -- Professor James Hendler hendler@cs.umd.edu Director, Semantic Web and Agent Technologies 301-405-2696 Maryland Information and Network Dynamics Lab. 301-405-6707 (Fax) Univ of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742 240-731-3822 (Cell) http://www.cs.umd.edu/users/hendler
Received on Wednesday, 11 December 2002 20:56:49 UTC