- From: Matt Oshry <matto@tellme.com>
- Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 18:22:05 -0800
- To: <malsburg@cl.uni-heidelberg.de>, <Greg.Inglis@telephonetics.co.uk>
- Cc: <www-voice@w3.org>
Titus and Greg, The Voice Browser Working Group (VBWG) is completing its resolution of issues raised during the review of the most recent Last Call Working Draft of VoiceXML 2.1 [1]. Following the process described in [2] for advancement to Proposed Recommendation, this is the VBWG's formal response to the issue you raised in [3], identified as 'R119' and [4], identified as 'R120': Thank you for suggesting this feature. The VBWG will consider it for a future version of VoiceXML. Please indicate before 4 December 2006 whether you are satisfied with the VBWG's resolution, whether you think there has been a misunderstanding, or whether you wish to register an objection. If you do not think you can respond before 4 December 2006, please let me know. The W3C Director will appreciate a response as to whether or not you agree with the resolution. However, if we do not hear from you at all by 4 December 2006, we will assume that you accept our resolutions. Thank you, Matt Oshry Chief Editor, VoiceXML 2.1 [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-voicexml21-20060915/ [2] http://www.w3.org/2004/02/Process-20040205/tr.html [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-voice/2006OctDec/0002.html [4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-voice/2006OctDec/0006.html
Received on Wednesday, 29 November 2006 02:21:49 UTC