FW: R116: Comments on LCWD, application.lastresult$

For archiving purposes.

________________________________

From: Shane Smith [mailto:safarishane@gmail.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2006 5:13 PM
To: Matt Oshry
Subject: Re: R116: Comments on LCWD, application.lastresult$


Matt,

This resolution is fine, my only hope is that it is clearly defined in
the spec, so that vendors are held accountable for implementation.

Thanks,
Shane Smith


On 11/28/06, Matt Oshry <matto@tellme.com> wrote: 

	Shane,
	
	The Voice Browser Working Group (VBWG) is completing its
resolution of
	issues raised during the review of the most recent Last Call
Working
	Draft of VoiceXML 2.1 [1].
	
	Following the process described in [2] for advancement to
Proposed 
	Recommendation, this is the VBWG's formal response to the issue
you
	raised in [3], identified as 'R116':
	
	According to 5.1.5 of VXML2, "[a]ll of the shadow variables
described
	above (aka application.lastresult$ ) are set immediately after
any
	recognition. In this context, a <nomatch> event counts as a
recognition,
	and causes the value of "application.lastresult$" to be set,
though the
	values stored in application.lastresult$ are platform
dependent." The
	VBWG believes that no further clarification is required.
	
	Please indicate before 4 December 2006 whether you are satisfied
with
	the VBWG's resolution, whether you think there has been a 
	misunderstanding, or whether you wish to register an objection.
	
	If you do not think you can respond before 4 December 2006,
please let
	me know. The W3C Director will appreciate a response as to
whether or
	not you agree with the resolution. However, if we do not hear
from you
	at all by 4 December 2006, we will assume that you accept our
	resolutions.
	
	Thank you,
	
	Matt Oshry
	Chief Editor, VoiceXML 2.1
	
	[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-voicexml21-20060915/
	[2] http://www.w3.org/2004/02/Process-20040205/tr.html 
	[3]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-voice/2006JulSep/0055.html