W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-voice@w3.org > October to December 2006

R117: Comments on LCWD, application.lastresult$

From: Matt Oshry <matto@tellme.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 18:22:10 -0800
Message-ID: <FA934E050E4E254E87339959D53F5C0BBF4222@EXM01.sea.tellme.com>
To: <tgoebel@voiceobjects.com>
Cc: <www-voice@w3.org>


The Voice Browser Working Group (VBWG) is completing its resolution of
issues raised during the review of the most recent Last Call Working
Draft of VoiceXML 2.1 [1].
Following the process described in [2] for advancement to Proposed
Recommendation, this is the VBWG's formal response to the issue you
raised in [3], identified as 'R117':

The example is informative. application.lastresult$.recording can be
submitted without the use of a temporary variable. The VBWG feels that
no clarifying text is required here. The behavior of &lt;submit&gt; is
described adequately in 5.3.8 of VXML2:

"If a namelist is supplied, it may contain individual variable
references which are submitted with the same qualification used in the
namelist. Declared VoiceXML and ECMAScript variables can be referenced."

Please indicate before 4 December 2006 whether you are satisfied with
the VBWG's resolution, whether you think there has been a
misunderstanding, or whether you wish to register an objection.

If you do not think you can respond before 4 December 2006, please let
me know. The W3C Director will appreciate a response as to whether or
not you agree with the resolution. However, if we do not hear from you
at all by 4 December 2006, we will assume that you accept our

Thank you,

Matt Oshry
Chief Editor, VoiceXML 2.1

[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-voicexml21-20060915/
[2] http://www.w3.org/2004/02/Process-20040205/tr.html
[3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-voice/2006JulSep/0056.html
Received on Wednesday, 29 November 2006 02:21:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:03:53 UTC