Re: [PLS1.0] i18n comment: Embeddable in other formats?

Hi Paolo, all,

Thank you very much for your mail. I am fine with your resolution. If
you don't here from other members of the i18n core working group, please
regard this issue as closed.

Regards, Felix.

Baggia Paolo wrote:
>  
> Issue R103-3
> 
> Proposed Classification: Clarification / Typo / Editorial
> 
> Resolution: Reject
> 
> We believe this request is outside the current scope of the PLS
> specification. That stated, we believe that adding support for an
> embedded lexicon within SSML and SRGS documents is valuable and should
> be considered for future versions of those specifications.
> 
> Paolo Baggia, editor PLS spec
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> From:
> Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2006 17:32:29 +0000
> To: www-voice@w3.org, public-i18n-core@w3.org
> Message-Id: <20060321173229.935DE4F402@homer.w3.org>
> 
> Comment from the i18n review of:
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-pronunciation-lexicon-20060131/
> 
> Comment 3
> At http://www.w3.org/International/reviews/0603-pls10/
> Editorial/substantive: E
> Owner: FS
> Location in reviewed document:
> General
> 
> Comment:
> 
> Is a pronounciation lexicon embeddable in other formats, e.g. like
> MathML in HTML? Please address this question at someplace.
> 
> 
> Gruppo Telecom Italia - Direzione e coordinamento di Telecom Italia S.p.A.
> 
> ================================================
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> This message and its attachments are addressed solely to the persons
> above and may contain confidential information. If you have received
> the message in error, be informed that any use of the content hereof
> is prohibited. Please return it immediately to the sender and delete
> the message. Should you have any questions, please send an e_mail to
> <mailto:webmaster@telecomitalia.it>webmaster@telecomitalia.it. Thank you
> <http://www.loquendo.com>www.loquendo.com
> ================================================
>