Re: [PLS1.0] i18n comment: Embeddable in other formats?

Issue R103-3

Proposed Classification: Clarification / Typo / Editorial 

Resolution: Reject

We believe this request is outside the current scope of the PLS
specification. That stated, we believe that adding support for an
embedded lexicon within SSML and SRGS documents is valuable and should
be considered for future versions of those specifications. 

Paolo Baggia, editor PLS spec

----------------------------------------------------------------
From: <ishida@w3.org> 
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2006 17:32:29 +0000
To: www-voice@w3.org, public-i18n-core@w3.org 
Message-Id: <20060321173229.935DE4F402@homer.w3.org> 

Comment from the i18n review of:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-pronunciation-lexicon-20060131/

Comment 3
At http://www.w3.org/International/reviews/0603-pls10/
Editorial/substantive: E
Owner: FS
Location in reviewed document:
General

Comment:
 
Is a pronounciation lexicon embeddable in other formats, e.g. like
MathML in HTML? Please address this question at someplace.



Gruppo Telecom Italia - Direzione e coordinamento di Telecom Italia S.p.A.

================================================
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
This message and its attachments are addressed solely to the persons above and may contain confidential information. If you have received the message in error, be informed that any use of the content hereof is prohibited. Please return it immediately to the sender and delete the message. Should you have any questions, please send an e_mail to <mailto:webmaster@telecomitalia.it>webmaster@telecomitalia.it. Thank you<http://www.loquendo.com>www.loquendo.com
================================================