Re: [PLS1.0] i18n comment: dc:language

Issue R103-21

Proposed Classification: Clarification / Typo / Editorial 

Resolution: Reject 

We do not see any relationship between the two declarations. The
attribute xml:lang is mandatory in PLS and dc:language will be ignored. 

Please indicate whether you are satisfied with the VBWG's resolution,
whether you think there has been a misunderstanding, or whether you wish
to register an objection.

Paolo Baggia, editor PLS spec.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
From: <ishida@w3.org> 
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2006 17:44:02 +0000
To: www-voice@w3.org, public-i18n-core@w3.org 
Message-Id: <20060321174402.29B634F400@homer.w3.org> 


Comment from the i18n review of:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-pronunciation-lexicon-20060131/

Comment 21
At http://www.w3.org/International/reviews/0603-pls10/
Editorial/substantive: S
Owner: RI

Location in reviewed document:
4.3, 1st example

Comment: 
How is dc:language="en-US" meant to be interpreted if it appears in a
metadata element? How does it affect the xml:lang declaration on PLS
elements?



Gruppo Telecom Italia - Direzione e coordinamento di Telecom Italia S.p.A.

================================================
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
This message and its attachments are addressed solely to the persons above and may contain confidential information. If you have received the message in error, be informed that any use of the content hereof is prohibited. Please return it immediately to the sender and delete the message. Should you have any questions, please send an e_mail to <mailto:webmaster@telecomitalia.it>webmaster@telecomitalia.it. Thank you<http://www.loquendo.com>www.loquendo.com
================================================