Re: [PLS1.0] i18n comment: Text out of synch with schema

Issue R103-4

Proposed Classification: Technical Error

Resolution: Accept

We agree that the Schema needs to be fixed. Our idea was to have a
strict order of meta, metadata and then lexeme elements. 

After a review of this issue our intention is to allow only one metadata
element, because it can contain many subelements. 

Please indicate whether you are satisfied with the VBWG's resolution,
whether you think there has been a misunderstanding, or whether you wish
to register an objection.
Paolo Baggia, editor PLS spec.

From: <> 
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2006 17:32:50 +0000
Message-Id: <> 

Comment from the i18n review of:

Comment 4
Editorial/substantive: S
Owner: FS
Location in reviewed document:

The description of the schema in the text does not match the schema
itself in various places.

For (one) example: the text defines a sequence of the meta element, the
metadata element, and a sequence of lexeme elements:meta.elt.type*,
metadata.elt.type*, lexeme.elt.type* but the schema says
(lexeme.elt.type | meta.elt.type | metadata.elt.type)*

Gruppo Telecom Italia - Direzione e coordinamento di Telecom Italia S.p.A.

This message and its attachments are addressed solely to the persons above and may contain confidential information. If you have received the message in error, be informed that any use of the content hereof is prohibited. Please return it immediately to the sender and delete the message. Should you have any questions, please send an e_mail to <> Thank you<>

Received on Friday, 26 May 2006 13:54:41 UTC