- From: Nick Kew <nick@webthing.com>
- Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2003 00:25:25 +0100 (BST)
- To: Asbjørn Ulsberg <asbjorn.ulsberg@nrk.no>
- Cc: "'Brennan.W.Stehling@jci.com'" <Brennan.W.Stehling@jci.com>, <www-validator@w3.org>
On Thu, 19 Jun 2003, Asbjørn Ulsberg wrote: > Brennan.W.Stehling@jci.com wrote: > > > I am interested in running a validator on the local network > > so that we can validate our intranet web applications. There are several available, free, shareware and commercial. For a small intranet you may be happy to validate page-by-page, but on a bigger net you'll probably want a more automated solution. Of course, I'd recommend Site Valet for larger and/or complex intranets. > I'm interested in the same thing, and I've been in contact > with Terje Bless about the problem, (Terje is normally around on this list, but I think he may be on the road just now). > and he stated that they > (or he) would develop a SOAP interface to the validator, so > that one could post HTML (escaped and embedded in XML, of > course) to the validator without using the hideous MIME multipart > format and such, and also get the response in XML and not HTML. The advantage of the MIME multipart format is that browsers support it out-of-the-box. It's not clear to me that your suggestion (escaped and embedded in XML) is any less hideous. > I haven't heard from Terje for some time now, so I have no > idea how this development is going. I hope it's progressing, > though. Anyone who knows anything on this subject? Don't hold your breath. It's not in the current beta update. It's two years since I first offered a similar XML-based service and published the XMLMessages update for OpenSP, but the W3C validator still isn't using it. -- Nick Kew
Received on Thursday, 19 June 2003 19:25:33 UTC