- From: Chris Casciano <chris@placenamehere.com>
- Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 13:10:48 -0500
- To: www-validator@w3.org
on 2/28/03 11:17 AM, Ville Skyttä at ville.skytta@iki.fi wrote: > > On Fri, 2003-02-28 at 08:47, Chris Casciano wrote: > >> - the file validator.conf file wasn't included in the tar dist... Grabbed it >> from cvs, made the needed changes (pointing at the parser in /sw/bin being >> one) & tossed it in /etc/w3c > > IIRC, that's a packaging buglet, check.cfg is the one that should be > copied to validator.conf wherever you like it. > Okie... I was just pointing it out for the record >> - at this point check picked up the config file, but wasn't parsing it >> properly tossing up an error for a uninitialized value for the sgml parser. >> Investigation (i.e. cvs) showed the config format was totally rewritten & >> migrated to Config::General so my files were out of sync (no surprise) >> >> - switched site to cvs version. Redid some html changes. Got the templates >> working. Template location is hard coded in check and I moved em so had to >> change that. > > You're aware that the CVS version that has the config file rewritten is > most likely HEAD, which is an unstable development branch, right?. > Don't expect things to work there for now... (use the CVS tag > validator-0_6_0-branch to access the latest and greatest stuff in the > "stable" branch). This is documented better in the upcoming 0.6.2 > release. > Yes, well aware. I'd be more concerned with the version/stability if I planned to let anyone besides myself access my mirror. As it is this was more a proof of concept so I merely followed the "documented" checkout procedures. >> BUT... Every document I run through the validator comes back with "This page >> is not Valid !" yet no messages are given in the "below are the results" >> section... This is the case with both valid and invalid docs. > > IIRC this is a symptom of a too old OpenSP, ie. one that doesn't > understand the -R option. You'll need OpenSP 1.5 (AFAICT any > pre-releases won't do) or Liam's lq-nsgmls. Or you can remove the -R > option but be aware of the security implications (search the list > archive for more info about this). > > HTH, Thx, it should. As I mentioned, I didn't have any luck getting Liam's lq-nsgmls installed in OS X. Running "%onsgmls --version" I get: <sp:message sp:id="mid0" sp:severity="I" > "OpenSP" version "1.5" But I will spend some time checking the archives and looking more into my OpenSP installation next time I get some time to work on this. -- [ Chris Casciano ] [ chris@placenamehere.com ] [ see things @ http://www.placenamehere.com ] [ read words @ http://www.chunkysoup.net/ ] [ buy prints @ http://placenamehere.com/store ]
Received on Friday, 28 February 2003 13:10:31 UTC