Re: Fallback flow for /site-meta for top level domains from David Fuelling on 2008-12-05 (www-talk@w3.org from November to December 2008)

From: David Fuelling <sappenin@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 19:28:04 +0000
To: "Dirk Balfanz" <balfanz@google.com>
Cc: "Breno de Medeiros" <breno@google.com>, "Eran Hammer-Lahav" <eran@hueniverse.com>, "Ben Laurie" <benl@google.com>, "Mark Nottingham" <mnot@mnot.net>, "www-talk@w3.org" <www-talk@w3.org>, "Jonathan Rees" <jar@creativecommons.org>
Message-ID: <51dae84d0812051128q13f8d472pd7497205f04e08fb@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 6:13 PM, Dirk Balfanz <balfanz@google.com> wrote:

> There was an objection that site-meta (which is served over http) should
> not be authoritative for email: URI schemes, but I think that was voted down
> :-)
>
>
I'm sorta new to these lists, but were you meaning to say that site-meta
*will* be authoritative for email: URI schemes, or that such an idea was
voted down (and thus, site-meta will *not* be authoritative for email: URI
schemes)?

David

Received on Saturday, 6 December 2008 14:52:27 UTC