On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 11:28 AM, David Fuelling <sappenin@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 6:13 PM, Dirk Balfanz <balfanz@google.com> wrote: > >> There was an objection that site-meta (which is served over http) should >> not be authoritative for email: URI schemes, but I think that was voted down >> :-) >> >> > I'm sorta new to these lists, but were you meaning to say that site-meta > *will* be authoritative for email: URI schemes, or that such an idea was > voted down (and thus, site-meta will *not* be authoritative for email: URI > schemes)? > What I was trying to say was that I heard good arguments on the list on why site-meta should be used (among other things, of course) to point to meta-data for email: URIs. Dirk. > David > > > >
Received on Friday, 5 December 2008 20:00:04 UTC