- From: <Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com>
- Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2001 10:21:46 +0200
- To: ldodds@ingenta.com, a.powell@ukoln.ac.uk
- Cc: www-talk@w3.org
> -----Original Message----- > From: ext Leigh Dodds [mailto:ldodds@ingenta.com] > Sent: 21 November, 2001 12:17 > To: Andy Powell > Cc: www-talk@w3.org > Subject: RE: What is at the end of the namespace? > > > > > So, I'll ask the same question I asked a few days back... > if I make an > > RDF statement about http://www.w3.org/2001/SMIL20/, am I making a > > statement about the abstract SMIL namespace or am I making > a statement > > about the HTML page that the uri resolves to? > > FWIW, I'd say the HTML page. > > What statements would you want to make about a namespace? > > You mention the dc:creator of the namespace, but wouldn't it > be more logical to make a statement about the schema, or vocabulary > which defines that namespace? > > I think the most I'd say about a namespace is that it is an > identifier. Exactly. A namespace is just "punctuation", per se. A namespace is not a vocabulary, even if a vocabulary may be grounded in one single namespace. Multiple disjunct vocabularies may all be defined in the same namespace. A single vocabulary may include terms grounded in different namespaces. A namespace is not a doctype or schema. A doctype/schema may use a single vocabulary grounded in a single namespace, or it may use several vocabularies, each of which have terms grounded in different namespaces. Several doctypes/schemata may use the same vocabulary. Namespaces are punctuation. Nothing more. Cheers, Patrick -- Patrick Stickler Phone: +358 50 483 9453 Senior Research Scientist Fax: +358 7180 35409 Nokia Research Center Email: patrick.stickler@nokia.com
Received on Thursday, 22 November 2001 03:22:07 UTC