- From: <Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com>
- Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2001 10:21:46 +0200
- To: ldodds@ingenta.com, a.powell@ukoln.ac.uk
- Cc: www-talk@w3.org
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ext Leigh Dodds [mailto:ldodds@ingenta.com]
> Sent: 21 November, 2001 12:17
> To: Andy Powell
> Cc: www-talk@w3.org
> Subject: RE: What is at the end of the namespace?
>
>
>
> > So, I'll ask the same question I asked a few days back...
> if I make an
> > RDF statement about http://www.w3.org/2001/SMIL20/, am I making a
> > statement about the abstract SMIL namespace or am I making
> a statement
> > about the HTML page that the uri resolves to?
>
> FWIW, I'd say the HTML page.
>
> What statements would you want to make about a namespace?
>
> You mention the dc:creator of the namespace, but wouldn't it
> be more logical to make a statement about the schema, or vocabulary
> which defines that namespace?
>
> I think the most I'd say about a namespace is that it is an
> identifier.
Exactly. A namespace is just "punctuation", per se.
A namespace is not a vocabulary, even if a vocabulary may be
grounded in one single namespace.
Multiple disjunct vocabularies may all be defined in the
same namespace.
A single vocabulary may include terms grounded in
different namespaces.
A namespace is not a doctype or schema.
A doctype/schema may use a single vocabulary grounded in a
single namespace, or it may use several vocabularies, each
of which have terms grounded in different namespaces.
Several doctypes/schemata may use the same vocabulary.
Namespaces are punctuation. Nothing more.
Cheers,
Patrick
--
Patrick Stickler Phone: +358 50 483 9453
Senior Research Scientist Fax: +358 7180 35409
Nokia Research Center Email: patrick.stickler@nokia.com
Received on Thursday, 22 November 2001 03:22:07 UTC