- From: <roconnor@Math.Berkeley.EDU>
- Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 17:26:12 -0800 (PST)
- To: <www-talk@w3.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 > > Yes, URIs *may* denote abstract resources. No, HTTP URLs may *not*. > > Patrick, as an author of both of those specifications, I can > definitively state that what you are saying does not match what I intended > when I wrote the sections to which you have referred. I must admit that I always thought that HTTP URIs were some retrivable resouce, but after looking at the introduction to RFC 2068: Practical information systems require more functionality than simple retrieval, including search, front-end update, and annotation. HTTP allows an open-ended set of methods that indicate the purpose of a request. It seems that Sean is right. HTTP URIs seem like they could mean anything. - -- Russell O'Connor roconnor@alumni.uwaterloo.ca <http://www.math.berkeley.edu/~roconnor/> ``This is not a time, as it is never a time, to seek vengeance, but a time to seek the courage to forgive'' -- George W. Bush -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (SunOS) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE79Gs3ZG3em5NXM14RAkbyAKDw6YfAKKSChm0+6mylR7gQZTRaxgCeIJby eTwsI1ja68wbFsgxdFerimg= =ruSG -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Thursday, 15 November 2001 20:26:17 UTC