- From: <roconnor@math.berkeley.edu>
- Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2001 15:15:26 -0800 (PST)
- To: <www-talk@w3.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I'm about ready to tackle the signing of web documents again. After reviewing the discussion last April, the best suggestion I've received is to use HTTP content-negotiation a la <http://www.w3.org/TR/photo-rdf/>. That is to have some sort of mime-type for a signature that could be retrived instead. This still strikes me as a poor solution because a document and it's signature are different resources, and I think that content-negotiation is for determining the format of the same resource. There was some mention of HTTP extensions somewhere. Anyone have comments on this? The solution really ought to be implemented as an HTTP solution so that all resources can be signed. - -- Russell O'Connor roconnor@math.berkeley.edu <http://www.math.berkeley.edu/~roconnor/> ``This is not a time, as it is never a time, to seek vengeance, but a time to seek the courage to forgive'' -- George W. Bush -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (SunOS) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE75cwSZG3em5NXM14RAkgzAJ4jslG0uyWZNr4ojeRoyjmn0ipLjACfXTJi n9LSm+ThUH66ADpzSjdpkXA= =m9/H -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Sunday, 4 November 2001 18:15:33 UTC