- From: Simon St.Laurent <simonstl@simonstl.com>
- Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2001 10:05:35 -0500
- To: www-talk@w3.org
While Common User Agent Problems (http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/NOTE-cuap-20010206) does an excellent job of identifying and describing some kinds of problems - I especially liked the HTTP and URI content - it doesn't feel like it was written with XML and/or XHTML in mind. I noted on xmlhack (http://xmlhack.com/read.php?item=1061) that issues involving namespace processing in Web browsers are left unaddressed. There are some substantial problems in that space, notably Microsoft's current use of the html: prefix (never mind the URI) to indicate HTML content in an XML document. For a quick summary, see: http://simonstl.com/articles/xbrowse/xbrowse7.html For more details on issues related to XML-in-browsers, see: http://www.xml.com/pub/2000/03/29/tutorial/index.html http://www.xml.com/pub/2000/04/19/opera/index.html http://www.xml.com/pub/2000/05/03/msie/index.html http://www.xml.com/pub/2000/05/03/browserchart/index.html http://simonstl.com/articles/xbrowse/index.html The document also ignores issues related to multiple flavors of HTML - Strict, Transitional, Frameset, HTML 4, XHTML 1, etc. - and the ways in which some browsers (IE 5/Mac, and I think Mozilla) use the DOCTYPE declaration to choose a processing mode: http://xmlhack.com/read.php?item=428 Finally, I'd argue that many of the cases mentioned in Appendix C of XHTML 1.0 could plausibly be described as 'Common User Agent Problems': http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/#guidelines Good luck encouraging good behavior in your members. Simon St.Laurent - Associate Editor, O'Reilly and Associates XML Elements of Style / XML: A Primer, 2nd Ed. XHTML: Migrating Toward XML http://www.simonstl.com - XML essays and books
Received on Thursday, 8 February 2001 10:01:06 UTC