- From: Jon Knight <J.P.Knight@lut.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 1 Jun 1995 09:45:44 +0100 (BST)
- To: Multiple recipients of list <www-talk@www10.w3.org>
[NB: I seem to have really stirred up a hornets nest here - I don't think I've ever had so many replies to posting to _any_ mailing list! So I'm going to reply to the list in one go rather than reply separately to lots of people.] My comments about just letting the CGI script return the document that the browser should reload has pulled up a few interesting points: 1) Some people seemed to think I was implying sending a redirect from the CGI script (or that's what they would have done). I didn't mean that at all - I intended the script to return the document to be reloaded not redirect the browser. An HTTP Redirect response from the script could easily result in the browser retrieving a cached copy of the document. Some people have pointed out that the CGI script might not know where the document to be loaded is located which is possible but unlikely, mainly because it would have to know where it is to issue the HTTP redirect. 2) Clients and caches can handle Expires: and Pragma: nocache headers badly. True. However, I use X Mosaic and a Harvest object cache all the time (and a CERN caching proxy before that) and I can't say that I really notice too many problems associated with this (plenty of other problems to do with the caches though! :-) ). The biggest problem appears to be when someone has a non-CGI document that includes dynamic information into an otherwise static HTML document (counters, etc) and the remote server doesn't send any useful headers to the cache. This has resulted in me hacking my copy of Mosaic to have some ``Really Reload'' and ``Open Direct'' options tucked away in it. IMHO things sitting in cgi-bin's pretty much always seem to work ok though. YMMV. 3) If the CGI script is invoked as a result of the POST method in a FORM, the output shouldn't be cached anyway. So maybe the moral of the story is always use POST insituations like this... :-) Lastly, the reason I made the comment was basically that's what I do with lots of the CGI scripts I write (the good old IETF way of basing things on implementation experience :-) ). Its interesting that so many people feel that they would have problems with these forms. It makes me wonder how many of my users have had these problems and just not told me about them... :-| Jon -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Jon Knight, Researcher, Sysop and General Dogsbody, Department of Computer Studies, Loughborough University of Technology, Leics., ENGLAND. LE11 3TU. *** Nothing looks so like a man of sense as a fool who holds his tongue ***
Received on Thursday, 1 June 1995 04:47:38 UTC