W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > July 2014

Re: [web-animations] TAG Feedback

From: Brian Birtles <bbirtles@mozilla.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 13:50:53 +0900
Message-ID: <53D879AD.40608@mozilla.com>
To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>, Sergey Konstantinov <twirl@yandex-team.ru>
CC: "public-fx@w3.org" <public-fx@w3.org>, www-tag <www-tag@w3.org>
On 2014/07/28 21:03, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 12:23 PM, Sergey Konstantinov
> <twirl@yandex-team.ru> wrote:
>> Also, if you have architectural questions which were not addressed in the review, feel free to ask them.
>
> It seems scheduling of all asynchronous things that affect layout is
> something that still needs sorting out:
> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=26440 At some point
> requestAnimationFrame() was introduced and engines started to align
> other events and callbacks with when it was invoked, but that's
> currently not defined and the ordering of those independent pieces
> seems like a potential interoperability hazard.

Yes, that's one of the outstanding pieces of review feedback. We still 
have a bit of work to do there. The section "Script execution and live 
updates to the model" needs to be completely rewritten in terms of tasks 
and we should address the relationship with requestAnimationFrame there.

(That section does already mention rAF towards the end but the language 
isn't very precise.)

Any help with doing that would be appreciated.

Best regards,

Brian
Received on Wednesday, 30 July 2014 04:51:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:57:03 UTC