- From: Brendan Eich <brendan@mozilla.com>
- Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2013 17:58:42 -0800
- To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- CC: Allen Wirfs-Brock <allen@wirfs-brock.com>, "es-discuss@mozilla.org list" <es-discuss@mozilla.org>, www-tag@w3.org, JSON WG <json@ietf.org>
http://bugs.ecmascript.org/ -- please use it, you will be amazed at how quickly the bug is resolved. Thanks, /be Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote: > If TC39 said ECMA-404 is going to be replaced by a verbatim copy of the > ABNF grammar in draft-ietf-json-rfc4627bis-08 with pretty much no other > discussion of JSON and a clear indication that future editions will not > add such discussion, and will not change the grammar without IETF con- > sensus, I would be willing to entertain the idea of making ECMA-404 a > normative reference. > > How soon would TC39 be able to make such a decision and publish a re- > vised edition of ECMA-404 as described above?
Received on Tuesday, 10 December 2013 01:59:13 UTC