Re: [Json] Response to Statement from W3C TAG

http://bugs.ecmascript.org/ -- please use it, you will be amazed at how 
quickly the bug is resolved. Thanks,

/be

Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:
> If TC39 said ECMA-404 is going to be replaced by a verbatim copy of the
> ABNF grammar in draft-ietf-json-rfc4627bis-08 with pretty much no other
> discussion of JSON and a clear indication that future editions will not
> add such discussion, and will not change the grammar without IETF con-
> sensus, I would be willing to entertain the idea of making ECMA-404 a
> normative reference.
>
> How soon would TC39 be able to make such a decision and publish a re-
> vised edition of ECMA-404 as described above?