Re: [Json] Response to Statement from W3C TAG

Hello Brendan,

On 2013/12/10 10:58, Brendan Eich wrote:
> http://bugs.ecmascript.org/ -- please use it, you will be amazed at how
> quickly the bug is resolved. Thanks,

Many thanks. As far as I can remember, this is the first time that 
somebody from the EcmaScript side has sent such an invitation.

In retrospective, I think it would have made a lot of sense to send such 
a mail (with a few more pointers) to the IETF JSON WG when ECMA 404 was 
being drafted.

I have checked the bugs that were already there, and submitted two 
additional bugs. I'm sorry I didn't do that yesterday; the confirmation 
mail for the bugzilla signup got delayed by about 20h (see below).

Regards,   Martin.


Excerpt from mail headers (more available on request):

Received: from ecmascript1.community.scl3.mozilla.com 
(ecmascript1.community.scl3.mozilla.com [63.245.223.13])
	by scmailgw02.scop.aoyama.ac.jp (secret/secret) with ESMTP id 
rBADOWwb024274
	for <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 22:24:32 +0900
Received: from ecmascript1.community.scl3.mozilla.com 
(unused-10-2-11-214.mozilla.org [127.0.0.1])
	by ecmascript1.community.scl3.mozilla.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id 
rBAAOT8Z009320
	for <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 02:24:29 -0800