- From: Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>
- Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2012 00:34:08 -0700
- To: Noah Mendelsohn <nrm@arcanedomain.com>, "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>
- CC: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, Stuart Williams <skw@epimorphics.com>, Dan Appelquist <dan@bluevia.com>, Amy van der Hiel <amy@w3.org>
On the topic of "URI scheme proliferation", I think the reference
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2012Sep/0012.html
is incorrect (since it is about media type suffixes, not URI scheme suffixes).
One pointer (although both broader and narrower) might be:
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=18975
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Noah Mendelsohn [mailto:nrm@arcanedomain.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2012 5:35 PM
> To: www-tag@w3.org
> Cc: Mark Nottingham; Stuart Williams; Dan Appelquist; Amy van der Hiel
> Subject: TAG F2F agenda more or less complete
>
> I have taken a first cut at assigning time slots for our sessions, and as
> previously noted, acting on requests to update the required reading. See
> [1,2]. Astute readers will note a few items in the body of the agenda that
> don't have assigned times, and a few TBD slots. I think this is close
> enough for now, or at least for comment by the TAG.
>
> I am teaching during the day tomorrow, then traveling overnight, so it's
> unlikely there will be significant further updates until Friday evening the
> earliest.
>
> Thank you!
>
> Noah
>
> P.S. Jonathan: I >think< I assigned sessions requiring your presence for
> afternoon slots when you can be available, but I couldn't quickly find the
> e-mail with your exact conflicts. Please check that I didn't miss anything.
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/tag-weekly
> [2] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2012/10/07-agenda.html
>
>
> =====================================================
>
> !DOCTYPE html>
>
> [1]W3C | [2]TAG | [3]previous | [4]this | [5]next
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/
> [2] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/
> [3] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2012/09/27-agenda
> [4] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2012/10/07-agenda
> [5] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2012/10/07-agenda
>
> W3C TAG meeting 7-9 October 2012 in London, UK
>
> Nearby: [6]work plan - [7]issues list - [8]findings -
> [9]www-tag archive - [10]tag archive - Actions: ([11]open,
> [12]pending review) [13]logistics
>
> [6] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/products/
> [7] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/issues
> [8] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/findings
> [9] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/
> [10] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/
> [11] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/open
> [12] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/pendingreview
> [13] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2012/10/local-arrangements.html
>
> Online table of: [14]scribing assignments
>
> [14] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2012/10/F2FScribing.html
>
> Agenda Summary
>
> Sunday, 7 October 2012
> Agenda
> 09:00-09:15
> * [15]Convene, review agenda
> * [16]Review TAG Priorities for 2012
>
> 09:15-10:30
> * [17]HTTP 2.0 (w/Mark Nottingham)
>
> 10:30-10:45 Break
> 10:45-11:45
> * [18]URI Scheme Proliferation (w/Mark Nottingham)
>
> 11:45-13:00 Lunch
> 13:00-14:30
> * [19]Fragment ID Semantics (Last Call Draft & RFC 3023bis)
>
> 14:30-15:00 Break
> 15:00-15:30
> * [20]Architecture of the World Wide Semantic Web
>
> 15:30-16:00
> * [21]TAG Election Procedures
>
> 16:00-16:45
> * [22]Administration
>
> Monday, 8 October 2012
> Agenda
> 09:00-10:30
> * [23]Publishing and linking on the Web
>
> 10:30-10:50 Break
> 10:50-12:00
> * [24]Governance Framework
>
> 12:00-13:15 Lunch
> 13:15-14:15
> * [25]TAG effectiveness
>
> 14:15-14:45
> * [26]Issue list for Jeff Jaffe
>
> 14:45-15:15 Break
> 15:15-16:45
> * [27]Documenting meaning of individual IRIs (ISSUE-57)
>
> Tuesday, 9 October 2012
> Agenda
> 09:00-10:15
> * [28]Offline applications
>
> 10:15-10:30 Break
> 10:30-12:00 TBD
> 12:00-13:15 Lunch
> 13:15-14:15
> * [29]Review TAG Priorities for 2012
> * Reassign Robin Berjon's actions
>
> 14:15-14:45 Privacy (needs an agenda item)
> 14:45-15:15 Break
> 15:15-16:00 TBD
> 16:00 ADJOURN
>
> Logistics
>
> Venue
> BCS, The Chartered Institute for IT
> First Floor, The Davidson Building
> 5 Southampton Street London WC2E 7HA
> Tel: +44 (0) 1793 417 666 | Fax: +44 (0) 1793 417 669
>
> We are scheduled to meet in the Wilkes Room all three days.
>
> See [30]logistics for further details.
>
> [30] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2012/10/local-arrangements.html
>
> Required Reading
>
> * [31]Best Practices for Fragment Identifiers and Media Type
> Definitions W3C Editor's Draft 23 September 2012
> * [32]Updated Product Page on Fragment Identifier Work
> * [33]RFC 3023bis regarding fragment ID semantics for +xml
> media types
> * First Public Working Draft [34]Publishing and Linking on
> the Web: W3C Working Draft 18 September 2012
> * [35]Governance and Web Architecture W3C Editor's Draft 22
> September 201 ([36]Larry's blog entry on governance is also
> suggested)
> * [37]ISSUE-57 background statement from JAR and HT (28
> September 2012) ([38]snapshot)
> * [39]URI Usage Primer How to Use URIs in Data: W3C Editor's
> Draft 03 October 2012
> * [40]ISSUE-57 "Proposal 27" from JAR and HT (30 September
> 2012) (see [41]email)
> * [42]31 March 2012 telcon discussion of Offline Web
> Applications
> * [43]Web Architecture Objectives Matrix
> * [44]Offline Applications (e-mail from Ashok Malhotra)
>
> [31] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/mimeTypesAndFragids-2012-09-
> 23.html
> [32] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/products/fragids-2012-09-26.html
> [33]
> http://www.w3.org/2006/02/son-of-3023/draft-murata-kohn-lilley-xml-04.html
> [34] http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-publishing-linking-20120918/
> [35] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/governanceFramework.html
> [36]
> http://blogs.adobe.com/standards/2012/09/19/governance-and-standards/
> [37] http://www.w3.org/wiki/TagIssue57Proposal27/Background
> [38]
> http://www.w3.org/wiki/index.php?title=TagIssue57Proposal27/Background&o
> ldid=61033
> [39] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/uri-usage-primer-2012-10-03/
> [40]
> http://www.w3.org/wiki/index.php?title=TagIssue57Proposal27&oldid=61086
> [41] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2012Oct/0003.html
> [42] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2011/03/31-minutes.html#item04
> [43] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/objectives-matrix-20120930
> [44] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2012Sep/0009.html
>
> Agenda Details
>
> 1. Convene, review agenda
> + Scribes: TAG members are encouraged to sign up for
> scribing by using CVS to edit [45]scribing assignments
> table, or by emailing the chair
> + Roll call
> o Regrets: Robin Berjon, Jonathan Rees
> o Jonathan can attend by phone starting around 1:00
> London time (8:00 US Eastern).
> + Approve minutes of teleconferences:
> o [46]20 September 2012
> o [47]27 September 2012
> + F2F Main Goals:
> o Go to last call on Fragment Identifiers
> Recommendation
> o Review comments on Publishing and Linking FPWD
> o Set direction for documenting URI meaning (&
> httpRange-14)
> o Meet w/Mark Nottingham to discuss HTTP 2.0 & URI
> scheme proliferation
> 2. Review TAG Priorities for 2012 - 2013
> + Goals:
> o Remind ourselves of priorities and commitments
> from [48]TAG product pages
> o The Sunday session is primarily a quick level-set
> at the start of the F2F — updates and debates
> about the priorities will happen as we go along
> and in a session on Tuesdeay.
> 3. Administration:
> + Future TAG F2F meetings
> o Choose location/dates for winter meeting
> o Start thinking about location/dates for spring
> meeting
> o TPAC (next item)
> + TPAC Planning
> o Note AB interest in meeting with TAG
> o Larry Masinter suggests we think about Publishing
> and Linking for TPAC
> o NOTE: Larry, Peter and Ashok will attend TPAC,
> Henry is hoping to. Noah has a conflict and so
> will not.
> + Group photo
> + Upcoming TAG election and open seat: four TAG seats
> will be filled in the upcoming election. Should the
> TAG do anything to facilitate a successful election
> (noting the unusually large number of open positions,
> and thus the likely large impact on the TAG.)
> 4. HTTP 2.0:
> + [49]IETF HTTP Bis Working Group chair [50]Mark
> Nottingham will join us for this session
> + Goal:
> o Get update from Mark Nottingham on HTTP 2.0
> o Decide whether TAG action is needed on HTTP
> futures
> + Background:
> o [51]January 2012 F2F discussion with Mark
> Nottingham
> o [52]ACTION-682: on - Jonathan Rees - When HTTPbis
> group says time is right, suggest to TAG sections
> of HTTPbis specification that TAG should review -
> Due: 2012-10-06 - OPEN
> o [53]ACTION-733: on - Larry Masinter - prepare for
> 30 minute report on HTTP 2.0/SPDY at October 2012
> F2F - Due: 2012-09-28 - OPEN
> o Earlier background:
> # Thread starting with e-mail from Yves Lafon:
> [54]Discussion points on HTTP "evolutions"
> [ACTION-618] — also related thread starting
> with [55]response from Larry Masinter
> # [56]ACTION-618: on - Yves Lafon - With help
> from Larry, Noah, and Jeni to prepare
> analysis on development around HTTP, like
> spdy, ssl use, websocket... - Due:
> 2011-12-06 - CLOSED
> # [57]ACTION-626: on - Noah Mendelsohn -
> Schedule discussion of how, if at all, TAG
> should continue to be involved with SPDY -
> Due: 2011-11-15 - CLOSED
> # [58]TPAC 2011 Discussion of SPDY
> # [59]Jeni Tennison's email on SPDY and
> related thread ([60]here and [61]here too)
> # June 2011 F2F [62]session with Jim Gettys on
> [63]buffer bloat
> 5. URI scheme proliferation:
> + Mark Nottingham will join us for this session
> + Goal:
> o Consider need for TAG focus on URI scheme
> proliferation
> + Background:
> o E-mail from Henry Thompson [64]FYI: Suffixed
> media type registrations about to go forward
> o [65]ACTION-724: on - Henry Thompson - investigate
> possible TAG efforts on URI scheme proliferation
> and extension points - Due: 2012-10-05 - OPEN
> 6. Fragment identifier semantics:
> + Product page: [66]TAG Product: Fragment Identifiers
> and Mime Types
> + TAG members assigned (as listed in product page): Jeni
> Tennison, Larry Masinter (offered to help on 3 May
> 2012), Henry Thompson, Yves Lafon (replacing Jonathan
> Rees as agreed at June 2011 F2F), Peter Linss (offered
> to help on 4 August 2011)
> + Goals:
> o Agree to publish last call working draft of
> [67]Best Practices for Fragment Identifiers and
> Media Type Definitions
> o Agree input to [68]RFC 3023bis regarding fragment
> ID semantics for +xml media types (We may do this
> as a separate session if necessary)
> + Background:
> o TAG Recommendation on Fragment IDS:
> # [69]Best Practices for Fragment Identifiers
> and Media Type Definitions W3C Editor's
> Draft 23 September 2012 (required reading)
> # [70]Updated Product Page (required reading)
> o RFC 3023bis and Fragment ID Semantics
> # [71]ACTION-689: on - Henry Thompson - work
> with Noah to draft a further request to the
> 3023bis editor from the TAG to include
> advice regarding what a particular +xml
> media type registration should do wrt fragid
> semantics along the lines in the discussion
> on media types and fragment identifiers at
> the f2f on 2012-04-04 - Due: 2012-10-01 -
> OPEN
> # [72]RFC 3023bis regarding fragment ID
> semantics for +xml media types (required
> reading)
> 7. Issue list for Jeff Jaffe:
> + Goal:
> o Start building list of issues to highlight for
> Jeff Jaffe
> + Background:
> o [73]ACTION-563: on - Noah Mendelsohn - Arrange
> for periodic TAG key issues reports to Jeff per
> June 2011 F2F - Due: 2012-11-01 - OPEN
> 8. Publishing and linking on the Web:
> + TAG members assigned: Larry Masinter, Ashok Malhotra
> + Goals:
> o Review comments on First Public Working Draft
> [74]Publishing and Linking on the Web: W3C
> Working Draft 18 September 2012
> o Update [75]product page to reflect current plans,
> goals and success criteria
> + See also agenda item on [76]governance
> + Background:
> o First Public Working Draft [77]Publishing and
> Linking on the Web: W3C Working Draft 18
> September 2012 (required reading)
> o [78]ACTION-732: on - Larry Masinter - prepare
> FPWD on Publishing and Linking - Due: 2012-09-05
> - CLOSED
> o [79]ACTION-737: on - Yves Lafon - On Tuesday 4
> Sept, if no objections, publish FPWD on
> Publishing and Linking - Due: 2012-09-06 - CLOSED
> o [80]ACTION-667: on - Noah Mendelsohn - Check,
> when publishing and linking wraps, whether it's
> time to reinvest in
> http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2011/12/evolution/Regi
> stries.html - Due: 2012-07-15 - OPEN
> 9. Architecture of the World Wide Semantic Web (AWWSW):
> + Jonathan Rees requests 30 mins: review final report
> drafts and either accept them, or request additional
> work (of Jonathan; the task group has disbanded).
> + [81]ACTION-201: on - Jonathan Rees - Report on status
> of AWWSW discussions - Due: 2012-10-02 - OPEN
> 10. Governance Framework:
> + Larry Masinter requests brief consideration of
> [82]Governance and Web Architecture W3C Editor's Draft
> 22 September 201 (required reading)
> + See also [83]Larry's blog entry on governance
> 11. Documenting meaning of individual IRIs (ISSUE-57):
> + Product page: [84]TAG Product: URI Documentation
> Discovery
> + TAG members assigned: Henry Thompson with help from
> Jonathan Rees & Jeni Tennison
> + Goals:
> o Decide how to discharge our obligation to the
> community regarding what we did with the
> proposals that they provided us back in the
> spring
> o Review new [85]background statement from JAR and
> HT (28 September 2012) ([86]snapshot)
> o Review: [87]URI Usage Primer How to Use URIs in
> Data: W3C Editor's Draft 03 October 2012
> o Review "Proposal 27"
> + Background:
> o [88]ACTION-704: on - Jonathan Rees - with help
> from Jeni and Henry to try to identify next steps
> for moving forward on httpRange-14 - Due:
> 2012-09-17 - OPEN
> o [89]Background statement from JAR and HT (28
> September 2012) ([90]snapshot) (required reading)
> o [91]URI Usage Primer How to Use URIs in Data: W3C
> Editor's Draft 03 October 2012
> o [92]"Proposal 27" from JAR and HT (30 September
> 2012) (see [93]e-mail) (required reading)
> o Though not formally agreed by the TAG as
> background reading David Booth [94]suggests the
> following additional documents:
> # [95]"Framing the URI Resource Identity
> Problem: The Fundamental Use Case of the
> Semantic Web"
> # [96]Resource Identity and Semantic
> Extensions: Making Sense of Ambiguity
> 12. Offline applications:
> + TAG member assigned: Ashok Malhotra
> + Should we include web app / offline storage here?
> + Goal:
> o Decide whether to launch initiative on offline
> Web applications
> o If so, prepare product page with goals, success
> criteria and dates.
> o Determine objectives of any architectural work in
> this area using the [97]Wed Architecture
> objectives matrix as reference
> o Clarify relationship to [98]ACTION-717: on -
> Ashok Malhotra - Propose outline for possible TAG
> document (finding or rec) on architectural issues
> relating to storage sync, linked data, etc. Due
> 2012-07-15 - Due: 2012-10-10 - OPEN
> + Background:
> o [99]Offline Applications (e-mail from Ashok
> Malhotra) (required reading)
> o [100]ACTION-529: on - Noah Mendelsohn - Schedule
> telcon discussion of a potential TAG product
> relating to offline applications and packaged Web
> - Due: 2011-02-17 - CLOSED
> o [101]31 March 2012 telcon discussion of Offline
> Web Applications (required reading)
> o [102]ACTION-717: on - Ashok Malhotra - Propose
> outline for possible TAG document (finding or
> rec) on architectural issues relating to storage
> sync, linked data, etc. Due 2012-07-15 - Due:
> 2012-10-10 - OPEN
> o [103]Objectives matrix (required reading)
> 13. Privacy (need to draft agenda item -- note Robin Berjon was
> responsible for work in this area
> 14. TAG effectiveness:
> + TAG member assigned: Noah Mendelsohn
> + Goals
> o Consider followup to [104]June Discussion of TAG
> Effectiveness ([105]part 1 and [106]part 2)
> o Review [107]Wed Architecture Objectives Matrix
> + Background:
> o [108]Objectives matrix (required reading)
> o [109]ACTION-726: on - Jonathan Rees - Make a list
> of questions to which webarch and the findings
> suggest answers, as input to possible 'study
> design' and/or communication to chairs etc. -
> Due: 2012-09-17 - CLOSED
> o Larry Masinter has suggested using the matrix for
> "outward facing purposes"
> o [110]ACTION-725 on JT - progress ?
> o Maybe: 10 minutes to talk about TAG issues list
> (this was JAR's discussion-closing suggestion at
> an earlier F2F, see [111]ACTION-692: on - Noah
> Mendelsohn - consider JAR's april request to
> discuss, for 10 mins, issues list at oct f2f -
> Due: 2012-09-10 - OPEN, perhaps mooted by
> objectives matrix)
> o [112]ACTION-709: on - Noah Mendelsohn - Talk to
> Jeff & W3M about TAG futures - Due: 2012-06-06 -
> CLOSED
> 15. TAG Election Procedures
> + Goals:
> o Understand concerns that have been raised about
> TAG election procedures (followup to
> [113]discussion on 26 April 2012 teleconference)
> o Decide what role, if any, it's appropriate for
> the TAG to play in addressing such concerns
> o If based on the above considerations it's
> appropriate for the TAG to get involved,
> investigate the merits of the concerns raised,
> and decide on next steps
> + Background:
> o Robin Berjon has made [114]proposals for
> "reforming" the TAG election process
> o [115]Discussion on 26 April 2012 teleconference
> o [116]ACTION-701: on - Noah Mendelsohn - Follow up
> with Robin on election reform - Due: 2012-08-01 -
> OPEN
> o [117]ACTION-702: on - Noah Mendelsohn - Follow up
> with Robin on election reform proposals - Due:
> 2012-05-03 - CLOSED
> o The chair (Noah) has [118]commented "...changes
> to the W3C process are formally the
> responsibility of the AB, W3C management and the
> AC. Normally, we don't discuss process issues on
> the TAG, except when they affect our ability to
> do our technical work [...] Obviously, changing
> the processes relating to the TAG itself is a
> special case, and I'm fine with scheduling some
> informal brainstorming". Larry [119]raises a
> similar concern. The chair then [120]wrote: "we
> will have a brief discussion of this on Thursday,
> and we will do it with the understanding that any
> formal work on changing the process is
> coordinated by the AB/Team/AC."
> o See also extensive e-mail thread(s) with subject
> [121]TAG productivity, elections, and
> httpRange-14 (but note that for discussion on 25
> April, the chair intends to limit the scope to
> election reform, and not to broader questions of
> TAG findings, TAG effectiveness, etc.)
> 16. Action item review:
> + [122]Pending review actions in [123]Tracker
> + [124]Overdue actions in [125]Tracker
> + [126]Open actions in [127]Tracker
> 17. Open issue review:
> + This is an optional agenda item: we'll do it if
> there's time
> + Goal: review our list of [128]open issues — look
> especially for issues that are open but dormant decide
> to assign resource/close/leave as background activity.
> 18. Outplan:
> + The following are potentially worth discussing, but
> are not formally scheduled on the agenda:
> o [129]ACTION-669: on - Henry Thompson - Review
> http://www.w3.org/TR/qaframe-spec/#ref-define-pra
> ctice and see whether TAG needs to do more on
> references to evolving specs Due: 2012-08-01 -
> Due: 2013-01-01 - OPEN
> o polyglot (HT)
> o HTML extension registry ([130]ACTION-672 on JT)
> o privacy (NM?)
> o scalability (PL)
> o vendor prefixes (PL)
> o ISSUE-50 if progress has been made (JAR, HT)
> # [131]ACTION-478: on - Jonathan Rees -
> Prepare a second draft of a finding on
> persistence of references, to be based on
> decision tree from Oct. 2010 F2F - Due:
> 2012-10-06 - OPEN
> # [132]ACTION-666: on - Henry Thompson -
> Update
> http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/products/persiste
> nce-2012-01-23.html to reflect agreement on
> 26 January telcon regarding settling at F2F
> - Due: 2012-09-01 - CLOSED (JAR commented:
> Have been making progress in background on
> what to do with this, based on input from HT
> and LM, but not sure I'll have anything to
> discuss.)
> __________________________________________________________
>
> [45] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2012/10/F2FScribing.html
> [46] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2012/09/20-minutes
> [47] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2012/09/27-minutes
> [48] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/products/
> [49] https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/charter/
> [50] http://www.mnot.net/
> [51] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2012/01/06-minutes#item02
> [52] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/682
> [53] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/733
> [54] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2011Dec/0034.html
> [55] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2011Dec/0042.html
> [56] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/618
> [57] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/626
> [58] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2011/11/04-minutes.html#item01
> [59] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2011Sep/0033.html
> [60] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2011Sep/0035.html
> [61] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2011Sep/0050.html
> [62] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2011/06/06-minutes.html#item0x
> [63] http://mirrors.bufferbloat.net/Talks/PragueIETF/
> [64] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2012Sep/0012.html
> [65] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/724
> [66] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/products/fragids.html
> [67] http://www.w3.org/TR/fragid-best-practices/
> [68]
> http://www.w3.org/2006/02/son-of-3023/draft-murata-kohn-lilley-xml-04.html
> [69] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/mimeTypesAndFragids-2012-09-
> 23.html
> [70] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/products/fragids-2012-09-26.html
> [71] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/689
> [72]
> http://www.w3.org/2006/02/son-of-3023/draft-murata-kohn-lilley-xml-04.html
> [73] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/563
> [74] http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-publishing-linking-20120918/
> [75] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/products/PublishingLinking.html
> [77] http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-publishing-linking-20120918/
> [78] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/732
> [79] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/737
> [80] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/667
> [81] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/201
> [82] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/governanceFramework.html
> [83]
> http://blogs.adobe.com/standards/2012/09/19/governance-and-standards/
> [84] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/products/defininguris.html
> [85] http://www.w3.org/wiki/TagIssue57Proposal27/Background
> [86]
> http://www.w3.org/wiki/index.php?title=TagIssue57Proposal27/Background&o
> ldid=61033
> [87] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/uri-usage-primer-2012-10-03/
> [88] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/704
> [89] http://www.w3.org/wiki/TagIssue57Proposal27/Background
> [90]
> http://www.w3.org/wiki/index.php?title=TagIssue57Proposal27/Background&o
> ldid=61033
> [91] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/uri-usage-primer-2012-10-03/
> [92]
> http://www.w3.org/wiki/index.php?title=TagIssue57Proposal27&oldid=61086
> [93] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2012Oct/0003.html
> [94] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2012Oct/0021.html
> [95] http://dbooth.org/2012/fyn/Booth-fyn.pdf
> [96] http://dbooth.org/2010/ambiguity/paper.html
> [97] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/objectives-matrix-20120930
> [98] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/717
> [99] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2012Sep/0009.html
> [100] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/529
> [101] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2011/03/31-minutes.html#item04
> [102] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/717
> [103] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2012/09/action-726
> [104] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/tag-weekly
> [105] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2012/06/13-minutes#item02
> [106] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2012/06/14-minutes#item03
> [107] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/objectives-matrix-20120930
> [108] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2012/09/action-726
> [109] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/726
> [110] https://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/725
> [111] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/692
> [112] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/709
> [113] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2012/04/26-minutes#item04
> [114] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2012Apr/0105.html
> [115] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2012/04/26-minutes#item04
> [116] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/701
> [117] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/702
> [118] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2012Apr/0143.html
> [119] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2012Apr/0147.html
> [120] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2012Apr/0151.html
> [121] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2012Apr/0153.html
> [122] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/pendingreview
> [123] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/
> [124] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/overdue
> [125] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/
> [126] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/open
> [127] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/
> [128] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/issues/open
> [129] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/669
> [130] https://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/672
> [131] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/478
> [132] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/666
>
>
> Noah Mendelsohn for the TAG
> $Revision: 1.916 $ of $Date: 2012/10/04 00:24:16 $
>
> [133]HTML5 Powered with CSS3 / Styling, and Semantics
> [134]Valid CSS!
>
> [133] http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=referer
> [134] http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/check/referer
>
>
Received on Thursday, 4 October 2012 07:34:47 UTC