- From: Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>
- Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 01:04:03 -0700
- To: Noah Mendelsohn <nrm@arcanedomain.com>, "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>
- CC: Florian Rivoal <florianr@opera.com>
I like Florian's proposal [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012May/0125.html it answers many of the questions I raised in: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2012Apr/0223.html about the problems with the deployment plans http://wiki.csswg.org/spec/vendor-prefixes I think in general that an extensibility method needs a credible deployment method. CSS, HTML, HTTP and many other formats have extensibility methods, most of which wouldn't stand up. So applying the lesson from CSS vendor prefixes to other extensibility mechanisms would be worthwhile. Larry
Received on Thursday, 10 May 2012 08:04:50 UTC