Re: Media typing of fragments

On 5/7/2012 4:06 PM, Robin Berjon wrote:
> I see how you could come to the conclusion you reach though. Given that this is explanatory text on a specification that is already well implemented[0] and a Proposed Recommendation the review period for which has been closed for ten days apparently with overwhelming support[1] (i.e. barring Team-only blocking comments, publication as Rec ought to be imminent), I suggest that rather than trying to get formal endorsement from the TAG you request an editorial improvement to the MFWG to clarify that they mean to define the usage of fragments inside the scope of their specification and not for the whole Web.

That sounds right. I will try to get to it today.

Noah

Received on Tuesday, 8 May 2012 14:28:52 UTC