On Fri, 2012-02-17 at 16:25 -0500, Jonathan A Rees wrote: [ . . . ] > That said, I'll give you a few days to review it. If you come up with > ways, within reason, to make the treatment of "meaning" more > hands-off, to bring the baseline closer to the status quo, or to > repair errors in the terminology, that will be a good thing and I'll > see what I can do to update the document. Thanks, I appreciate that. I've been working on it, and I plan to have suggestions ready by Monday night (tomorrow). -- David Booth, Ph.D. http://dbooth.org/ Opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of his employer.Received on Sunday, 19 February 2012 19:16:17 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:56:42 UTC