- From: Ian Davis <lists@iandavis.com>
- Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2010 10:05:12 +0000
- To: Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>
- Cc: nathan@webr3.org, Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>, www-tag@w3.org
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 7:27 PM, Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org> wrote: > This debate has been raging continuously since 2004 or maybe earlier, > so my first reaction is "not again". Well, me too. But I'm now of the opinion that 5 yrs of implementation experience of httpRange-14 is saying it's an unnecessary overhead and an impediment to linked data adoption by the mainstream. Talis is heavily invested in making linked data successful and has a great deal of implementation experience in infrastructure, publishing and consumption which is informing the arguments in my post. > > If someone who is following the threads could post a summary here of > the arguments pro and con, or anything they've learned, when things > settle down a bit, I would be grateful. > Actually my original blog post attempts to do that, listing out the current disadvantages of relying on 303 redirects and the principle advantage of doing it. http://iand.posterous.com/is-303-really-necessary Ian
Received on Friday, 5 November 2010 10:05:48 UTC