- From: Nathan <nathan@webr3.org>
- Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2010 09:31:59 +0000
- To: Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>
- CC: Graham Klyne <GK-lists@ninebynine.org>, Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>, "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>
Larry Masinter wrote: > Almost all of the use cases for tdb I can think of need a timestamp, > even when the description isn't varying (such as with data:). agree, but also see a big need for the non-dated semantic indirection on the web, especially in linked data territories, thus looking for some way to make that possible, without another 5-10 year lead time. > And duri with data: doesn't make sense to me. Likewise to some extent, however, with duri: duri:2010:tdb:data:,The%20US%20president and non temporally bound: tdb:data:,The%20US%20president Regardless of this though, definitely need fragments in the URIs, encoded or not. Thanks again for your time and consideration, Best, Nathan
Received on Friday, 5 November 2010 09:39:50 UTC