W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > January 2010

Re: Courtesy notification: call for consensus on HTML normative language reference issues

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2010 11:54:12 +0100
To: "Anne van Kesteren" <annevk@opera.com>, "Maciej Stachowiak" <mjs@apple.com>, noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
Cc: "Michael(tm) Smith" <mike@w3.org>, "Paul Cotton" <paul.cotton@microsoft.com>, "Philippe Le Hegaret" <plh@w3.org>, "Sam Ruby" <rubys@intertwingly.net>, "www-tag@w3.org WG" <www-tag@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.u5z8kmrl64w2qv@annevk-t60>
On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 11:32:21 +0100, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>  
wrote:
> On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 06:36:21 +0100, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>  
> wrote:
>> On Dec 15, 2009, at 3:00 PM, noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com wrote:
>>
>>> [...] endorse the proposed disposition of HTML WG issue-59 in
>>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2009Dec/0249.html  ,  
>>> i.e.
>>> the class=author view and the informative reference guide, provided the
>>> relaxng is appended to the informative reference guide, which will be
>>> published as a Working Draft and taken to Last Call [...]
>>
>> I don't think I can commit on behalf of the Working Group to publish  
>> the document as Last Call, nor do I think the Working Group itself can  
>> credibly pre-commit to that step. [...]
>
> Non-normative documents are published as WG Note, not as Last Call  
> documents.

Apparently there is plenty of precedence for publishing them as W3C REC in  
the end (e.g. RDF and OWL primers). Forgot about that. Not sure whether it  
is worth it.


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Monday, 4 January 2010 10:54:59 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:56:32 UTC