Re: URIs, deep linking, framing, adapting and related concerns

Note that the analysis of the BBC iplayer Web application
essentially shows up the lengths that sites go to today to
disable deep linking.

Dan Connolly writes:
 > On Tue, 2010-02-09 at 12:44 -0600, Dan Connolly wrote:
 > > On Thu, 2009-11-12 at 15:15 -0600, Dan Connolly wrote:
 > > [...]
 > > > http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/322
 > > > 
 > > > I'm working with Rigo and others to find people qualified
 > > > to research the legal as well as technical aspects.
 > > > 
 > > > A somewhat arbitrary estimate on when I'll have news is
 > > > end of January.
 > > 
 > > The search for qualified (and *available*) writing
 > > resources continues.
 > > 
 > > I bumped the due date back to 2010-03-23 in tracker;
 > > perhaps we'll have more news then.
 > 
 > That was a month ago, and there's still not much news
 > in the way of resources. (though we have seen some
 > news about deep linking in general).
 > 
 > Is it useful for me to keep my finger in the dike
 > for another few months? Or should I just withdraw
 > this action?
 > 
 > 
 > -- 
 > Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
 > gpg D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
 > 

-- 
Best Regards,
--raman

Title:  Research Scientist                              
Email:  raman@google.com                                
WWW:    http://emacspeak.sf.net/raman/                  
Google: tv+raman                                        
GTalk:  raman@google.com                                
PGP:    http://emacspeak.sf.net/raman/raman-almaden.asc    

Received on Tuesday, 27 April 2010 23:56:27 UTC