- From: Ed Davies <edavies@nildram.co.uk>
- Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 16:30:11 +0100
- To: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
- CC: www-tag@w3.org
Mark Baker wrote: > Those are properties of the name itself. Obviously the names are different. Exactly. I'm saying that the 303'd URI is a property of the original URI, not of the resource identified, as I suggested in this message: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2007Jun/0022.html Names having different properties doesn't stop them being aliases. >> 5. they are suitable for use in the same >> circumstances. >> >> 6. they have dictionary definitions which are >> word-for-word identical. > > No? I would expect both of those would hold. Why wouldn't they? 5. Consider polite or medical terms vs swear words, for example, or URIs defined by your own company vs those defined by a competitor. 6. Because they're in different dictionaries written by different people with different backgrounds and maybe in different languages, which is analogous to URIs defined by different people...
Received on Wednesday, 25 July 2007 15:33:38 UTC