- From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@expway.fr>
- Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2006 18:49:31 +0100
- To: noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
- Cc: www-tag@w3.org
On Jan 03, 2006, at 18:13, noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com wrote:
> You're probably right. Then again, I think there's a point of view
> that
> even when the piece parts are combined by reference, the overall
> semantic
> of the document results from the combination, just as it does when
> combining by nesting (inclusion). As I understand it, CDF is on a
> path to
> saying that event propagation, layout, etc. are essentially the
> same in
> the two cases. That symmetry gives me some pause.
As one participant in the CDF WG and not speaking for the group, I
would certainly welcome the TAG's input, decisive or discursive, on
whether inclusion and reference may/should/must (not) behave, look,
and mean the same.
--
Robin Berjon
Senior Research Scientist
Expway, http://expway.com/
Received on Tuesday, 3 January 2006 17:49:43 UTC