- From: Elliotte Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
- Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 10:10:53 -0500
- To: www-tag@w3.org
Dan Connolly wrote: > Maybe I can approach the question differently: what's the full > URI of RDDL's nature property? You seem to be coming from an RDF space I stopped paying attention to years ago, so I'm pretty sure I don't understand the background for your questions or comments. I don't mean to say that you're wrong by any means; just that I honestly don't understand why these things seem at all important to you. As far as I've noticed: 1. RDDL's nature property has never been treated as or considered to be a resource. 2. Consequently, nobody has ever bothered to assign a URL to it. 3. I don't see what benefit would be achieved by defining it as a resource and assigning a URL to it. At least that what it looks like from where I'm sitting. You're sitting in a different place, and probably using different tools so you may well see something I don't. However everything I've ever needed to do with RDDL or thought of maybe one day doing with it is perfectly well served by the current setup, without needing a URI for "RDDL's nature property". It never occurred to me to ask for one, and I'm not sure what I would do with it if I had one. I can think of a lot of fun and useful things to do with the text and markup of actual RDDL documents, but URIs for nature properties just don't enter into that. I am assuming here there's a distinction between the URI for RDDL's nature property and the URIs of particular RDDL natures. Did I read you right about that? -- Elliotte Rusty Harold elharo@metalab.unc.edu Java I/O 2nd Edition Just Published! http://www.cafeaulait.org/books/javaio2/ http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=0596527500/ref=nosim/cafeaulaitA/
Received on Wednesday, 20 December 2006 15:11:12 UTC