Re: RDDL natures: for the record

On Wed, 2006-12-20 at 07:12 -0500, Elliotte Harold wrote:
> Dan Connolly wrote:
> > We were sketching RDF stuff and I asked what rddl: in rddl:nature
> > expanded to, and I was told , so I asked
> > what the web says about , and we got a 404.
> > 
> > If rddl: is supposed to expand to , then that's 
> > different.
> You're not missing anything. rddl: expands to not 
> We just didn't initially see why you expected there to be anything at 
> since we never linked to anything there or 
> advertised that URL.

If rddl: expands to , then suggesting the use
of rddl:nature as an RDF/XML property element name is advertising
the URI .

Maybe I can approach the question differently: what's the full
URI of RDDL's nature property?

> I'm still not sure you're justified in assuming there should be 
> something at but at least now I see where 
> you're getting that URL from.
Dan Connolly, W3C
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E

Received on Wednesday, 20 December 2006 14:50:14 UTC