- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 08:50:06 -0600
- To: Elliotte Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
- Cc: www-tag@w3.org
On Wed, 2006-12-20 at 07:12 -0500, Elliotte Harold wrote: > Dan Connolly wrote: > > > We were sketching RDF stuff and I asked what rddl: in rddl:nature > > expanded to, and I was told http://www.rddl.org/ , so I asked > > what the web says about http://www.rddl.org/nature , and we got a 404. > > > > If rddl: is supposed to expand to http://www.rddl.org/# , then that's > > different. > > You're not missing anything. rddl: expands to http://www.rddl.org/ not > http://www.rddl.org/# > > We just didn't initially see why you expected there to be anything at > http://www.rddl.org/nature since we never linked to anything there or > advertised that URL. If rddl: expands to http://www.rddl.org/ , then suggesting the use of rddl:nature as an RDF/XML property element name is advertising the URI http://www.rddl.org/nature . Maybe I can approach the question differently: what's the full URI of RDDL's nature property? > I'm still not sure you're justified in assuming there should be > something at http://www.rddl.org/nature but at least now I see where > you're getting that URL from. > -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Wednesday, 20 December 2006 14:50:14 UTC