Re: RDDL natures: for the record

Dan Connolly wrote:

> We were sketching RDF stuff and I asked what rddl: in rddl:nature
> expanded to, and I was told , so I asked
> what the web says about , and we got a 404.
> If rddl: is supposed to expand to , then that's 
> different.

You're not missing anything. rddl: expands to not

We just didn't initially see why you expected there to be anything at since we never linked to anything there or 
advertised that URL.

I'm still not sure you're justified in assuming there should be 
something at but at least now I see where 
you're getting that URL from.

´╗┐Elliotte Rusty Harold
Java I/O 2nd Edition Just Published!

Received on Wednesday, 20 December 2006 12:13:11 UTC