- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 22:03:12 -0600
- To: Jonathan Borden <jonathan@openhealth.org>
- Cc: www-tag@w3.org
On Dec 19, 2006, at 9:46 PM, Jonathan Borden wrote: [...] > Moreover, DanC was heard to say that he can't endorse RDDL because > http://www.rddl.org/nature returns 404 --- WTF??? > > http://www.rddl.org/natures gives you back a document describing RDDL > natures. > > http://www.rddl.org/#nature gives you one of the locations in the RDDL > spec where rddl:nature is described. > > What made anyone thing that http://www.rddl.org/nature was supposed to > resolve????????? > > Am I seriously missing something? Maybe I am. We were sketching RDF stuff and I asked what rddl: in rddl:nature expanded to, and I was told http://www.rddl.org/ , so I asked what the web says about http://www.rddl.org/nature , and we got a 404. If rddl: is supposed to expand to http://www.rddl.org/# , then that's different. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Wednesday, 20 December 2006 04:03:24 UTC